“Money We Can Believe In”

“As Good As Gold”

For those who lean left or right, I would have created the same currency for Bush had I thought of it then. Contrary to mainstream media belief, the Republicans were big spenders too during the Bush years. They have only become fiscally conservative to have something to counteract the Democrats with since this mostly neo-conservative Republican party has been duped into loving and supporting wars (you know who you are). How Christian of you…

Understand the Truth

I am neither left nor right in my political views. The media would have you argue left versus right politics till you are blue or red in the face. The whole time the elites of the world, including those who are in Congress, you know, the one’s you keep electing to office each year, are destroying our monetary system. It’s the monetary system that keeps things going. Congress should let the bad banks fail and we move on with a secure system. Instead, both sides of the political aisle, in the name of “saving the system” only put us further into debt and deficits.

So What’s Next?

If you are a Christian, Atheist, Black, White, Gay, Straight, you are being affected by what Congress does. It matters not who is at the top except for the executive powers they abuse.

I will create a new currency exposing the same issues for the next President if Obama doesn’t get elected to a second term, although Romneyazillion just doesn’t have the same zing to it…

The point of the Barackazillion currency is to mock our Federal Reserve System that continues to print money out of thin air in allowing Congress to pay for things (wars, deficits and national debt), thus enslaving us for years to come. This has to end! Electing a different leader doesn’t change anything!

I’ve personally used the Barackazillion to pay for a taxi ride. I convinced the driver that it was a new currency available here in the U.S. and he accepted it (I later paid cash after testing out my theories that I could convince people it is acceptable currency). This is the level we have devolved to in America. People believe anything they hear…like from the mouths of Congress and the media. In the end, Congress will do what the elitist want them to do. They’ll bail out the banks. They’ll bail out big business. They’ll have you pay for it. Why don’t you citizens here in America understand this? Why do you believe everything the media tells you to believe as if it’s Gospel? The media is complicit in what is happening too. Why don’t most of you who are glued to the television get it? Of course there are exceptions to this…more people are waking up.

Much of this analysis I do will be explained further in my forthcoming book, “We the Serfs.” I have spent the last 5 years working on this book and have put all the pieces of the puzzle together for you to understand what’s really going on in America. It is a Christian/Political book based on facts. It is also a book that those of any other religion, ethnicity or sexual orientation, will agree makes sense. Of course those in Congress and the media won’t really like it, except for a few.

This isn’t any kind of conspiracy theory either. When I say the media is complicit, I can prove it. Of course there isn’t any media in America that will allow me to explain, so I am going after those who keep the truth from U.S. citizens by mocking them. It’s rather easy for me to do you know… Naturally, creating a currency that competes with Federal Reserve Notes would not be something that Congress or the Federal Reserve would want for us citizens. That’s why they tax gold and silver at 28%. They don’t want competition to their monetary system scheme. But unfortunately, it is this scheme that cannot last, and you will be the one left without a chair at the end unless you do something now.

Solutions

Congress would not be able to do this if there was no Federal Reserve enabling them to spend more than they have available. Congress would not be able to keep spending more than they have available if there were a Constitutional amendment to constrain their spending to income earned like the rest of us have to do living here in America.

Ending the Fed and implementing a Constitutional amendment would result in the following;

• The over-spending by Congress would end
• The wars would end and lives saved
• The economy would recover

You have choices come election time. That’s what the media would have you believe. But no matter who you elect won’t change the flawed system. The rules have to change first, and we elect people who will abide by those rules. Every Congressman swears to uphold the Constitution. They simply don’t once in office. So taking away one of their tools that allows them to spend like drunken sailors is the first step. We must End the Fed. A second step is to implement a Constitutional amendment that constrains Congress with SEVERE penalties, including personal ones (loss of government pension, loss of health care benefits in retirement, etc.), if they don’t adhere to it. Without the penalties, Congress will continue to abuse us citizens like they have since 1971. Make it personal and they’ll act in our best interest rather than the elite’s. After all, it is We the People they serve.

There is of course more to it than these simple changes. Again, this will be explained further in my forthcoming book.

What happens if there are no Congressional constraints and the Federal Reserve continues to implement Quantitative Easing?

If we don’t do something that stops this madness that Congress and the Fed have become, the result will be “We the People Serfs.” It will result in the end of the greatest country’s economic system on earth. It will result in the end of our monetary system as we know it because everything Congress and the Fed does is unsustainable. It’s simple math folks…there’s a reason why our kids calculators can’t compute one Trillion….or one Barackazillion (you really do have to watch the Barackazillion video).

We must live within our means as a nation for the system to work! Everyone else has to! This is the issue…

Feel free to pass this message on to your family and friends…or, do nothing and just elect the same people into office who cater to the elite’s because they have the tools to make themselves wealthy at your expense. It’s up to you to be proactive. Enlightenment can come with a simple forwarding of this message….

Related posts:

1. We’re Winning The War On Terror!
2. Your Senate Hard at Work Spending Your Tax Dollars and Increasing the Federal Debt Again
3. America’s Infrastructure In 2009: Grade “F”

——————————————————————————–
Voting Fourth Party Part 2

Sandra Hamilton wrote an article on voting Fourth party that I had posted here recently.

There were some comments on how writing in Ron Paul could be a “wasted vote.”

In this sequel to her first article on writing in Ron Paul, she addresses this issue as well as presents a letter you can send to your congressman explaining why the system needs to be changed so your vote can be counted.

Remember, Ross Perot received 20% of the popular vote in 1996, but received ZERO electoral votes. The system is even worse now (aka rigged) so that 3rd parties won’t ever be able to debate any of the other parties.

It is only through the action of writing to your congressmen or eventually electing congressmen who think like we do that real change will happen.

Voting for those that maintain the status quo accomplishes nothing.

I hope you read her article by clicking on the url below and also take action as she has suggested.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/hamilton5.html

Doug Eberhardt

Related posts:

1. Ron Paul Needs to Hire Britney Spears!
2. Ron Paul Should Leave The Republican Party
3. Voting Fourth Party

Doug Eberhardt

Voting Fourth Party
by Sandra Hamilton

Most of the people that I know are not happy with the political choices they have for President this year. I hear lots of talk about voting against one guy or the other, but not so much talk about voting FOR anyone. There is one man, however, that a great many people wish they could vote for and that is Ron Paul. His supporters have their news page set to pick up all stories about him, they go to rallies thousands of miles away to support a man who is not even in the running anymore, and his support is not waning, in fact, it is growing.

Recently, Ron Paul held a news conference and suggested that people vote for a third party candidate. Notably absent from his side, was the third party candidate Bob Barr, the Libertarian Party candidate. Despite the snub, Ron Paul still stood up for Barr and others in an effort to stop the insanity. If you want change, then you have to change the way you vote. Repeating the same mistakes and expecting different results is the definition of insanity.

I spent the day reading articles about Ron Paul’s historic speech. I found it strange that the pundits, who once ignored Ron Paul completely, suddenly were terribly interested in his opinions. It seems that as soon as Ron Paul says something that might affect the anointed ones, they must report. Would Ron Paul’s words make his supporters more or less likely to vote for McCain? Obama? Who will this affect more?

Meanwhile, the comments from Ron Paul supporters were all about which third party member to vote for, who should they support now? Reading between the lines it appears that his supporters are still loyal, only now they are not sure how to remain loyal.

If we are to accept that voting for the lesser of two evils is still a vote for evil (and I do accept that premise), then why throw your vote around willy-nilly? Voting for a third party candidate simply because they are a third party candidate makes no sense. You still have to use your mind in this election. You still have to choose a candidate to vote FOR.

At this point in this article I had intended to tell people that wish to vote for Ron Paul to do so by writing his name in on the ballot. I have bad news. Research revealed that in most states, a candidate must jump through a bunch of legal hoops to have their names counted as a write-in. The supposed argument is that you are never actually voting for a candidate, just a slate of electors who will go to the Electoral College to vote for your candidate and if those electors are not registered ahead of time, then in fact, you are not voting for anyone.

However, some states have managed to do away with all that nonsense. This is a nice page that breaks down the rules state by state, but as rules are constantly changing, I ask that you please check the rules for your state and not rely on the information in that link. My question is, if some states can allow you to vote for whomever you wish why can’t they all? What is so difficult about allowing the American people to pick the person they want to be President? Why is this so dangerous?

Every year we get these huge get-out-the-vote drives that are designed to legitimize a system and to make you think you have a choice. If you knew you did not have a choice you might balk a little. So they pretend to give you a choice between a statist and another statist and do everything in their power to prevent you from hearing the non-statist point of view and if you dare to learn of it on your own, they will stop you from being able to vote for your particular candidate. They are good at it.

This year I find myself with a huge dilemma. I typically vote Libertarian, but this year I cannot. I do not like the candidate. I choose not to support that candidate. I also do not like the other third party candidates. If I vote against a guy, then I am telling the guy I voted for that I like him. That would be false and I do not want to send that message. If I similarly vote Libertarian no matter who the candidate is, then I am telling the Libertarian Party that I do not care who they choose, but I do care. I do not want this year’s candidate to be President. I initially thought I would just write-in Ron Paul and feel good about myself. It turns out, much to my chagrin, that my state has one of those laws that will not count write in candidates unless the candidate filed certain papers and has not already lost a primary. (They call it the sore loser law. But if the people later discover they like the loser better than the winner, where is the harm in letting them choose?) So if I vote for Ron Paul, it will be counted as a “write-in” but not as a vote for Paul.

I have gone over this multiple times. Do I support the Libertarian Party even though I do not support the candidate? That goes against my principles. Do I choose any other third party to send a message? Again, that goes against my principles. I choose not to vote against people but to vote for them. Therefore, I am left with the decision to write in the name Ron Paul. I think he would make a great President. I know my vote will not count as a vote for Dr. Paul, but it will be counted in the generic category of “write-ins.” When they show the total of people in my state who do not like the choices they were given I will be among them. And that is the message I truly want to send with my vote. I do not accept your chosen few. I am an American and as so I believe I have the right to vote for whom I choose.

Perhaps if enough people also wrote-in their vote, these draconian write-in laws will be removed. In Delaware, for example, (correct me if I am wrong) if you write in a candidate, that vote will count, period. I think we all have that right.

I thought about not voting at all because I do not want to legitimize the system, but those non-votes are simply seen as apathy. I am not apathetic. I am passionate: Extremely passionate for liberty.

So this election, I will be making a statement. I will vote for the man I believe to be the best candidate, I will do my best to expose a corrupt system that prevents most of us from making a real choice, and I will sleep well. If you feel the same way, I ask you to join me. Even writing in “none of the above” sends a message. I ask you to think about the message you wish to send with your vote. If you want change then change.

Peace.

September 13, 2008

Sandra Hamilton is a retired attorney.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/hamilton4.html

Here is what I wrote Sandra in reply to her article:

Hi Sandra,

I think this is a perfectly written article that Lew Rockwell posted!  I wrote an article on another website back in March that Ron Paul should leave the Republican Party: http://www.nolanchart.com/article3131.html – I keep wondering why he won’t make the move to run, but he still thinks he can make a difference in the House being the minority vote against the evil duopoly (even though we know he’s almost always right!).

While the revolution will evolve, and I am writing to further the cause, I just wish I could have my vote count for Ron Paul, but alas, will “feel good about myself” by voting for whom I want to be President, just like you!  Maybe by next election we can get the write-in candidate approved in advance, but then we have that electoral problem whereby Ross Perot received 20% of the votes, but received ZERO electoral votes.  Like “not voting for anyone” indeed! Ugh!

Peace!

Doug Eberhardt

Related posts:

1. A Solution for Ron Paul Supporters?
2. Ron Paul Should Leave The Republican Party
3. Ron Paul Needs to Hire Britney Spears!

I’m mixing up my normal type of support article for Ron Paul….frustration sometimes does this to me! I want to see if just by adding the name “Britney Spears” to a Ron Paul article if viewership will increase by any significant amount. But in writing the article, I actually have come to like the idea it represents!

Britney Spears and Ron Paul should be hooked at the hip like the two actors, Matt Damon and Greg Kinnear, in the movie, “Stuck on You.”

This will accomplish one of two things. It will either stop the media flurry over Britney Spears where she can lead a normal life again as the paparazzi won’t follow her around any longer or it will cause the media to report on the every move of Ron Paul.

I don’t write this article in a “Spoof” or “Wonkette” mocking manner. There is a degree of seriousness to it. I do realize it is “somewhat” far-fetched or wishful thinking, but desperate times call for desperate action! Nothing has worked so far right?

TMZ, Entertainment Tonight, Access Hollywood, you know…what America watches each night for an hour, along with the regular media’s consistent reporting, would give Ron Paul all the coverage he needs between now and November.

Seriously, what do you think would happen? The media can’t get enough of Britney Spears! Ron Paul would finally get some coverage!….except on Fox News of course…but only war loving neocons watch that channel anyway….

Imagine that…Britney Spears would become an American Hero! The headlines would be; “Britney Spears Helps Save America!” or “Britney Spears Helps Save the Dollar!” But the best aspect to it all is Ron Paul would finally get the media coverage that is coming to him. As a matter of fact, it would make up for all the media coverage he HASN’T received over the last year! His “message” would finally get through to the masses!

Take that biased MSM!

Now all we need to do is draft Britney Spears into the rEVOLution! She may not be the perfect campaign spokesperson, but we’d put a gag order on her and just use Britney for her uncanny ability to draw media attention. It would probably keep her out of trouble having a good fatherly figure around her and she would have some appeal to the youth vote! Hey, we need the votes!

Anyone have her number?

Doug Eberhardt

Related posts:

1. A Solution for Ron Paul Supporters?
2. It’s Not Too Late For Ron Paul!
3. The Ron Paul rEVOLution, Super Tuesday and “The Message!”